Many
in our world today have come to conclude that Jesus was nothing more than a
metaphor, serving as a symbol of love, peace and compassion. The Christ
consciousness which apparently dwells within all of us. Others religiously
follow the Zeitgeist movement which believes Jesus to be a mythological figure,
a metaphor for the sun. The goal of this
post is to display to the reader the evidence which stands in support of the
existence of a PHYSICAL and NON-METAPHORICAL being who went by the name of Jesus of Nazareth.
1)
Cornelius Tacticus was a senator
and a historian
of
the Roman Empire. He was
viewed as one
of the more accurate historians of the ancient world. Tacticus, in his final work called the Annals
spoke about a
man named Christ and his execution under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius.
He
also talked about a suffering group who people called Christians.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A copy of the second Medicean manuscript
of Annals,book 15 chapter 44
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Flavius Josephus is one of the most famous Jewish historians to have ever lived. He is also the author of what is called the Antiquities of the Jews which was written around 93–94 AD. In book 18 chapter 3 of his work, he talks about a man named Jesus who was the Christ. He also speaks to his crucifixion on the cross as well as his gathering of both Jews and Gentiles:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A leaf from the 1466 manuscript
of the Antiquitates Iudaice
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) The Babylonian Talmud. This work is basically a collection of Jewish writings. It is the basis for all Jewish rites and laws. Seeing that the Talmud speaks in opposition to Christ, insomuch as attacking him with insults and falsehood, it would be very likely for its content to leave out or deny the crucifixion of Jesus. Yet what we read is that it still points to and speaks about the event in Sanhedrin 43.a. This text stands in support for the existence of Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On
the eve of Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before
the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, "He is going
forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to
apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward and
plead on his behalf." But since nothing was brought forward in his favour
he was hanged on the eve of the Passover! - Ulla retorted: Do you suppose that
he was one for whom a defence could be made? Was he not a _Mesith_
[enticer], concerning him Scripture says, _Neither shalt though spare, neither
shalt thou conceal him?_ With Yeshu however it was different, for he
was connected with the government for royalty [i.e., influential]. Our Rabbis
taught: Yeshu
had five disciples, Matthai, Nakai, Nezer, Buni, and Todah.
Sanhedrin 43.a
The Babylonian Talmud |
Complete and utter rubbish:
ReplyDelete1) Tacitus: not contemporary , only talking about what christians believed and told him.
He wrote after Paul, if not even after the gospels were produced, that would depend on when you date them.
NOT EVIDENCE.
2) Josephus: not contemporary and clearly tempered by chrsitians. No Jew would have said that Jesus was the Messiah and use other purely christian attributes for him.
The second line that contains the mention of JAMES is most probably not even refering to the Jesus of the bible, because the name YESHUAH/YOSHUAH was among the most common names in ancient Palastine.
3) The babylonian Thalmud most definitely does not refer to the biblical Jesus and if anyone reads what is actually said even in this article there is no way that this would be congruent to the story of the bible.
This would actually put Jesus 100 years ealier, because the Sanhedrine had, under roman oocupation not even the power to do what is described in the quote.
If you need more sources for what I said:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
Or read Richard Carriers books, actually maybe Bart Ehrmans are enough, eventhough he defends the historical Jesus, but he dispells that these "sources" you are using are in anyway what you claim them to be in everybook he has written about Jesus.